Authors:
(1) Limeng Zhang, Centre for Research on Engineering Software Technologies (CREST), The University of Adelaide, Australia;
(2) M. Ali Babar, Centre for Research on Engineering Software Technologies (CREST), The University of Adelaide, Australia.
Table of Links
1.1 Configuration Parameter Tuning Challenges and 1.2 Contributions
3 Overview of Tuning Framework
4 Workload Characterization and 4.1 Query-level Characterization
4.2 Runtime-based Characterization
5 Feature Pruning and 5.1 Workload-level Pruning
5.2 Configuration-level Pruning
7 Configuration Recommendation and 7.1 Bayesian Optimization
10 Discussion and Conclusion, and References
3 OVERVIEW OF TUNING FRAMEWORK
In this study, we break down the entire knob tuning pipeline into five essential components: Workload Characterization, Feature Pruning, Knowledge from Experience, Configuration Recommendation as depicted in Fig. 1. The initial phase, Workload Characterization, is crafted to comprehensively model a workload, utilizing either logical-level queries or embedding runtime metrics for a dynamic understanding of performance indicators Feature Pruning, applied both at the workload-level to minimize execution time and at the configuration-level to streamline the search space, is strategically employed to enhance efficiency through the application of pruning techniques. Knowledge from Experience draws upon historical insights, enabling the tuning algorithm to efficiently converge towards optimal configurations. Finally, Configuration Recommendation involves utilizing diverse techniques, including Bayesian Optimization, Neural networks, Reinforcement learning, and Search-based methods, to generate configurations finely tailored to the specific characteristics of the workload.
This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED.